WASHINGTON DC. We first helped bring this story to social media back in February 2016. We didn’t write the original story, it was published in The Hill, a Washington DC newspaper covering mostly DC-related politics.
ISIS Executions. Photo: Uncredited.
Whistle-blower: Obama Admin Scrubbed Suspected Terrorists From DHS Database
The most extensive coverage that exposed this story was published by a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed against the Department of Homeland Security on February 13, 2015. The case is: Judicial Watch v Department of Homeland Security (Case# 1-15-cv-00222).
The Obama Administration scrubbed DHS’ database of suspected Islamic terrorists.
“Judicial Watch announced today that it obtained 183 pages of documents from the Department of Homeland Security revealing that the Obama administration scrubbed the law enforcement agency’s “Terrorist Screening Database” in order to protect what it considered the civil rights of suspected Islamic terrorist groups.”
“The documents appear to confirm charges that Obama administration changes created a massive “hands off” list. Removed data from the terrorist watch list could have helped prevent the San Bernardino terrorist attack.”
U.S. Inspector General Report (redacted and declassified) (183pps PDF)
Why would a U.S. President want to wipe out suspected terrorists from a government’s data base? This kind of makes one wonder which side is President Obama on? As President Obama’s Secretary of State John Kerry said, he’d rather just have the media report on it at all (Video).
It appears the Obama Admin thought they could just delete files from a computer and suddenly terrorists would simply go away. And if only the media would stop informing the world by exposing such radicals, then we could all live in a Fantasyland – together (until the terrorists show up to kill you?)
As it turns out, there may be an internal cover-up. Democratic congressman found that there were seventy-two people who work at the Department of Homeland Security who are on the terror-watch list.
“…we did an investigation — the inspector General did — of the Department of Homeland Security, and they had 72 individuals that were on the terrorist watch list that were actually working at the Department of Homeland Security,” Lynch told Boston Public Radio hosts Jim Braude and Margery Eagan. “The director had to resign because of that.”
So if you are a terrorist, or terrorist sympathizer and worked inside the Obama Administration, guess it would be prudent for them to wipe suspected terrorist names off their list?
NetAdvisor.org® is a non-profit organization providing public education and analysis primarily on the U.S. financial markets, personal finance and analysis with a transparent look into U.S. public policy. We also perform and report on financial investigations to help protect the public interest. Read More.
SAN JOSÉ, Costa Rica. President Obama will once again bypass and violate Congress’ Constitutional authority by reaching an illegal immigration agreement with Costa Rica. The Obama Administration will facilitate in trafficking 8,000 illegal alien Cubans who claim they are allegedly “trapped” in Costa Rica.
The migrants left Cuba on their own and headed to Costa Rica. They hoped to work their way to the United States from Central America, eventually through Mexico, but were stopped when the Nicaraguan government decided to close their border from the illegals.
False Narrative
Technically no one is “trapped” in Costa Rica. They could be sent home which is what most normal sovereign nations would do to those who enter a country illegally. Costa Rica planned on deporting just 56 new illegal aliens and issued nearly 8,000 “Transit Visas,” coincidentally about the same number of people Obama is planning to bring to the U.S.
Last month, Costa Rica closed their borders to those trying to enter the country illegally from Panama.
What we have is a false political narrative to make people think that there is some sort of desperation or humanitarian crisis. The crises was self-created by the illegal aliens who paid traffickers $4,000 to $7,000 to come to another country illegally. Somehow were are led to think that the U.S. needs to finish the ‘trafficking job’ for the human traffickers? Read More…
Discussion in this report:
Politics
Statistics
The Courts
The Welcome $ Wagon
The 2016 Election
Trafficking Terrorism
WASHINGTON DC. The U.S. southern border has seen a surge of tens-of-thousands illegal immigrants mostly from Latin America. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) reported in 2010 that over 17,000 people were arrested at the U.S. border that were not from Mexico, Latin America, South America, or western islands. Many of these people were from counties that tend to be non-U.S. friendly such as Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Pakistan, Syria and Yemen for example. It is not known how many made it inside the U.S. undetected.
[1] Obama’s Cuts Border Security.
In 2011 the Obama Administration reportedly cut the 1,200 national guardsman’s from the U.S. border down to 300. This of course makes it easier for those wanting to get in the U.S. illegally and now with less border enforcement. This action question’s the President’s thinking about keeping the U.S. border secure from terrorists and drug cartels who seek to gain presence in the U.S.
Abstract: Twenty-six (26) States sued the U.S. Government (Obama Admin) for Obama’s (illegal) immigration action (amnesty) program in 2014. With good cause, the Court GRANTED Plaintiffs temporary injunctive relief which stops Obama’s de facto amnesty program(s).
The case, STATE OF TEXAS, ET AL., v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., was filed and heard IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION, HON. Andrew S. Hanen, United States District Judge, Presiding.
The following is synopses in the Judge’s MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Case number is 1:14-cv-00254. Here is a copy of the official Court Order: (Local PDF, 123pps).
Plaintiffs may now take their case to trial. The Obama Administration is seeking an appeal of this injunctive relief.
Read the report summary and see the Court Order….
