CNN: Hillary Won – Most Everyone Else: Trump Won

September 27, 2016

CNN: Hillary Won? – Most Everyone Else: Trump Won

Original article written by Net Advisor™

HEMPSTEAD, New York. The first presidential Debate of 2016 came and went. Now many in the media are trying to re-frame everything of what you saw and heard to what political pundits (including many media) want you to think you saw and heard.

CNN claimed that Hillary won (62% to 27%) according to their one poll.

Steven Shepard, Campaign editor for the politically left-leaning Politico, weighed in with a claimed win for Hillary Clinton. This was based on an unknown number of people who participated in a post-debate survey.

“These are the members of The POLITICO Caucus, not all of whom participated in this special survey.” (page bottom. red emphasis added).

But if you go to Politico’s twitter account, the people are saying something else.

Trump weighed in with this:

and this:

Hillary Clinton just noted CNN’s poll and seemed to ignore all the ones she was losing.

The debate gathered a record 84 million viewers. So we gathered other opinion polls that seem to tell another story, and greatly outnumbered Politico’s and CNN’s polling.

Twitter was active with social media users hash-tagging key terms for anyone who wanted to participate in their poll could. Note the number of responses (randomly posted here in order of largest participants by votes – at time of post).

https://twitter.com/RealAlexJones/status/780599526230863874

https://web.archive.org/web/20160927211508/https://twitter.com/cernovich/status/780591673638256640

We even put out our own twitter poll, genuinely asking people who won the first presidential debate.

The next debate will be October 4th. Here is the current schedule.

Image Credits as noted if known: Please advise for any unknown credits. Tweets posted by public accounts from twitter.com

Original content copyright © 2016 NetAdvisor.org® All Rights Reserved.

NetAdvisor.org® is a non-profit organization providing public education and analysis primarily on the U.S. financial markets, personal finance and analysis with a transparent look into U.S. public policy. We also perform and report on financial investigations to help protect the public interest. Read More.

Related Articles

No Picture
Elections - Voting

Funny Video Tells All About the Jeb Bush 2016 Campaign

WINDHAM, New Hampshire. As the hotly contested 2016 Presidential election comes this November, we came across this video from CSPAN that aired a very small gathering of apparent Jeb Bush supporters in Windham, New Hampshire (Dated Dec. 19, 2015).

Please excuse the unprofessional video quality but it was an impromptu video capture, edited for highlights, and music added to focus on non-verbals rather than substance to prove a point. The video shows it doesn’t really matter what Mr. Bush says, the non-verbals of his audience tells the whole story. Watch the (very short) video….

No Picture
Elections - Voting

Is the U.S. Constitution at Risk in Election 2016?

WASHINGTON DC. The next U.S. President will likely nominate one, maybe two or three Supreme Court Justices. Nominating those with judicial activism is a big concern.

“Judicial activism occurs when judges write subjective policy preferences into the law rather than apply the law impartially according to its original meaning. As such, activism does not mean the mere act of striking down a law.”

— Source: Heritage Foundation Report: How to spot judicial activism

Activism is not the role of a judge, but rather the impartial rule of law. Here we examine Pres. Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Donald Trump’s views about the Supreme Court and stated intent or in the case of Barack Obama, existing actions.

Read More…

No Picture
Guns

Hillary Clinton Wants to Take Away Your Guns Too

Hillary Becomes More Radical to Drum-up Political Support.

Excerpt: A review of the radicalization of Hillary Clinton. Clinton and Obama’s gun control actions and their intent through analyzing their own statements on firearms, attacking the First and Second Amendment, and compare what the truth (law and courts) have ruled. We note Clinton and Obama’s support of state-sponsored terrorism (Iran). Clinton attacks the Supreme Court, and the U.S. Constitution. If elected, Clinton already has made clear intention to bypass Congress, bypass the laws of the United States, and rule administratively, like a tyrantess.

Another fully cited report from NetAdvisor.org. Read More…