FBI Says Will Not Recommend Charges in Clinton email Case

July 5, 2016 original publish date
Aug. 7, 2016 update

James Comey's official portrait as the Seventh Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Public Domaon. Credit Source: en.wikipedia.org
James Comey’s official portrait as the Seventh Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Public Domaon. Credit Source: en.wikipedia.org

FBI Says Will Not Recommend Charges in Clinton email Case

original article written by Net Advisor™

WASHINGTON, DC. FBI Director James Comey said the agency would not bring charges against Hillary Clinton, the lead candidate for the 2016 Democrat Party. The follow is a summary of Comey’s statements (Official Transcript).

  • FBI asked the owner of emails whether they were classified or not. Thus the FBI did not self-determine whether emails were classified or not, but rather deferred such determination to the originating agency, which in some cases would be the Obama-Clinton State Department.
  • The FBI reviewed approximately 30,000 emails that were handed over to the FBI by Hillary Clinton’s attorneys.
  • The FBI admitted that there were over 30,000 email that were not reviewed because they were deleted in such in a way that they have been deemed by the FBI as “unrecoverable.”
  • 58 email chains were deemed “classified” at the time they were sent or received.
  • FBI says (Sec of State Hillary) ‘should have known better,’ and ‘other participants should have known better’ whether email content was classified or not, even if it was not marked such as the time. The participants in question were “careless” in handling classified information.
  • FBI admitted that (Sec of State Hillary) had no full-time security staff to protect government emails.
  • The FBI said that there was no direct evidence of successful hack on Clinton emails. However FBI found that (Clinton’s) personal domain was used outside USA in ‘hostile environments’ (foreign adversarial countries) where ‘hackers could have accessed emails and FBI would not know that.’
  • The FBI admitted that there is ‘potential evidence’ in this case, however the FBI will not recommend a referral to the DOJ.
  • FBI cannot find a previous case where there was intentional misconduct.
  • FBI said it had ‘no outside influence.’
  • FBI did not answer any questions.

There was no comment on (Hillary Clinton) public corruption case, or whether that is being investigated or its status, which arguably would be very serious.

An update to this report is located here.

____________________________________________________________________________

Original image by may be copyright by their respective owner.

Original article content, Copyright © 2016 NetAdvisor.org® All Rights Reserved.

NetAdvisor.org® is a non-profit organization providing public education and analysis primarily on the U.S. financial markets, personal finance and analysis with a transparent look into U.S. public policy. We also perform and report on financial investigations to help protect the public interest. Read More.

___________________________________________________________________________

Related Articles

No Picture
Elections - Voting

Is the U.S. Constitution at Risk in Election 2016?

WASHINGTON DC. The next U.S. President will likely nominate one, maybe two or three Supreme Court Justices. Nominating those with judicial activism is a big concern.

“Judicial activism occurs when judges write subjective policy preferences into the law rather than apply the law impartially according to its original meaning. As such, activism does not mean the mere act of striking down a law.”

— Source: Heritage Foundation Report: How to spot judicial activism

Activism is not the role of a judge, but rather the impartial rule of law. Here we examine Pres. Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Donald Trump’s views about the Supreme Court and stated intent or in the case of Barack Obama, existing actions.

Read More…

No Picture
Elections - Voting

Hillary Clinton ADMITS: Saudi and Qatar Support Terrorism, While Clinton’s Accept Their Money

WASHINGTON, DC. It has been just over 15 years since the 9/11 (2001) terror attacks on the New York World Trade Center that killed 2,977 people (plus the 19 hijackers), and injured over 6,000 more. These events still have unanswered questions on who else was financing and supporting the airline hijackers?

This report discusses the Bush and Obama Administration’s 9/11 cover-up that seems to implicate ties to Saudi Arabia. Further, a WikiLeaks email shows that Hillary Clinton admitted that the Saudi and Qatar Govs Support ISIL (ISIS) and other terrorists groups. Hillary Clinton also admitted that the Saudi’s have been exporting terrorism for over 30 years.

Yet, the Clinton’s have received millions of dollars from Saudi and other Middle-eastern interests. Were the Clinton’s effectively paid hush money or otherwise expect special favors for defending Saudi and others while taking their money?

Read More in another fully-cited report…

No Picture
Elections - Voting

FBI Says Will Not Recommend Charges in Clinton email Case (archived)

WASHINGTON, DC. FBI Director James Comey said the agency would not bring charges against Hillary Clinton, the lead candidate for the 2016 Democrat Party. The follow is a summary of Comey’s statements

Notes: Nov. 21, 2018 Re-post July 5, 2016 archive: The original page has been redirecting incorrectly, and we have not resolved the issue. We copied our original source (July 5, 2016 post with Aug 7, 2016 update) and archived that copy here.